"business model"

can the industry survive in a post-napster world?
1) People want uninhibited ownership of their music.
2) A few lawsuits can't change a massive public notion of what the law should be.
3) The health of our creative landscape relies on rewarding artists directly for the music that they create.
4) People want their music to acquire portability.
5) People want their music to have permanence.
6) People want a lot of music.
7) People aren't willing to pay what they used to for music.

Mr. Reynolds thinks music should be socialized, with government involvement. sounds good, but can it work?